Evaluating base widening methods.
-
2013-12-01
-
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:The surface transportation system forms the biggest infrastructure investment in the United States of which the
roadway pavement forms an integral part. Maintaining the roadways can involve rehabilitation in the form of
widening; which require a longitudinal joint between the existing and new pavement sections to accommodate the
wider travel lanes, additional travel lanes or modification to shoulder widths. Several methods are utilized for the
joint construction between the existing and new pavement sections; vertical, tapered and stepped joints. The main
purpose of this research is to develop a formal recommendation as to the preferred joint construction method that
provides better pavement support in the State of Wyoming. Field data collection of Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
(DCP), Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD), base samples for gradation and moisture content were conducted on 28
existing and 4 newly constructed widening projects. Survey of practices and preferences of other states, and
constructability issues were undertaken. Costs of each joint type were compared as well.
Results of the analysis indicate that the tapered joint technique showed relatively better pavement strength compared
to the vertical joint type, and could be the preferred joint construction method. The vertical joint has an 18% increase
in cost compared to the tapered joint. This research is intended to provide information and/or recommendation to
state policy makers as to which of the base widening joint techniques (vertical, tapered, stepped) for flexible
pavement provides better pavement performance.
-
Format:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type: